Marcel Winatschek

In It for the Hearts

Converse is selling sneakers with hearts on them for Valentine’s Day.

On the surface, it’s a completely transparent marketing play—find a holiday, slap a symbol on the product, done. But there’s something almost honest about it. These are Chuck Taylors and Chuck 70s, shoes that already exist, that people already know and wear. You’re not inventing some limited-edition exclusive moment. You’re just adding hearts to something solid and letting people decide if they want to walk around saying something.

The collection has two approaches: the Sucker for Love line keeps the hearts subtle, trading the typical Converse star for heart details. Then there’s Love the Progress, which doesn’t fuck around—hearts everywhere. No hiding what you’re about.

I get the appeal. Converse are cheap enough that you won’t feel stupid in six months when February’s dead and the hearts feel embarrassing. They’re cool enough that you don’t have to pretend you don’t care about how you look. And unlike flowers or chocolate, they actually last. You wear them. You’re literally moving through the world in something someone picked for you because they thought about you.

The shoes come in blue, red, and some pale peachy-yellow thing that probably looks good on the right person. Sixty-five to a hundred and ten euros. They’re available now if you want them.

Valentine’s gifts are always this weird translation problem—you’re trying to say something and you buy a thing instead. The thing has to carry the meaning somehow. Most gifts fail because they’re too arbitrary or too aggressive. But shoes work. They’re something you use. And if you’re wearing hearts, you’re literally saying something every single time you step outside.