Marcel Winatschek

Skrillex Hair

Around 2010 or so, I started seeing undercuts everywhere. Not in a theoretical way—actually seeing them in person, in the street, in bars, on people who probably weren’t thinking that hard about why they’d chosen to shave half their head. One side gone, the other side left long enough to fall across. Some people pushed it further, clippered both sides down to nothing, kept a strip of longer hair down the middle. The variations didn’t matter. The principle was the same: you looked like you were part of something.

We’d seen this before. A couple years earlier, every teenage girl in every German town had that Tokyo Hotel haircut—the swoopy emo thing, black hair covering one eye, deliberately feminine and deliberately not. It was unavoidable. The kind of trend that makes you understand trends aren’t really about aesthetics or individual choice. They’re about visibility. Someone popular does something, enough people see it, suddenly it’s everywhere, and then everyone else does it because it’s already everywhere.

Dubstep happened, and Skrillex was the face of it. Not the inventor of dubstep, not even the best producer, but the one visible enough—young, weird-looking, making music that sounded like speaker feedback, performing it aggressively. And he had an undercut. That probably mattered more than the music itself. The music was a vehicle. The haircut was the actual signal.

I watched people switch into it the way you’d expect. Club kids first, which made sense—dubstep was a club thing. Then it started spreading outward, into regular life, until it was just another available option at the salon, something you could point to in a magazine and say that one. I saw it on cashiers and bartenders and people who probably listened to everything and nothing, who just thought it looked cool and didn’t care about Skrillex or the scene.

What gets me is how efficient it is. You don’t have to explain yourself anymore. You cut one side of your head and people understand something about you immediately, whether it’s true or not. You’re signaling that you’re at least adjacent to something—edgy, alternative, part of a subculture, even if that subculture is just people who like how undercuts look. It’s a shorthand. You buy credibility with your barber appointment.

I know how this ends. It’s already ending, actually—the trend peaked a couple years back and now it’s settling into permanent option territory, like any other look. In ten years I’ll see photos from this era and feel that specific embarrassment that comes with recognizing your own time clearly. But right now it’s still happening. Every time I pass a salon I see someone in the chair with clippers against the side of their head, that other section of hair about to be released into the world, already knowing exactly what they’ll look like when they walk out. Part of something. For now.