Marcel Winatschek

Between the Phone and the SLR

The Olympus STYLUS XZ-2 existed in the narrow gap between what your phone could do and what you’d need a shoulder bag to carry—a serious compact for people who weren’t ready to haul glass around but wanted more than a sensor the size of a fingernail. In late 2013, that gap was still defensible territory. Just barely.

What made it worth carrying was the lens ring—a physical control band on the barrel that rotated for aperture and shutter in manual mode, or for zoom and fine focus in optical mode. A tactile anchor in a product category that had mostly surrendered to buttons and menus. The f/1.8 maximum aperture at the wide end was genuinely fast for a fixed-lens compact, and in low light it showed. The tilting touchscreen let you compose from angles that would otherwise require lying on the floor or holding the camera above your head and guessing. Small things, but they accumulate into a camera that actually wants to be used.

The background blur it produced always looked slightly calculated compared to a fast prime on a larger sensor—a separation that reads as intended rather than natural. Whether that bothered you depended on what you were shooting and how closely you were going to examine the results. For street, for travel, for anything where the camera needed to disappear into a jacket pocket and come out fast, the trade-off was reasonable. The phone cameras of 2013 weren’t yet good enough to make this argument moot, which gave cameras like the XZ-2 their window. A few years later that window closed almost entirely—the high-end compact became something for specialists rather than a sensible option for everyone else. The XZ-2 was either one of the last of something good or exactly the right camera for exactly the right moment, depending on how generous you’re feeling about the march of progress.