Marcel Winatschek

The Watch That Never Had to Try

A friend of mine named Clara has worn the same silver Casio for as long as I’ve known her. Simple digital face, metal bracelet, the kind of watch that costs less than a round of drinks and somehow looks right on every wrist it lands on. Bartenders wear them. Students wear them. People who could afford something significantly more expensive wear them and don’t feel the need to explain themselves.

Casio launched its first digital watches in 1974, and by the nineties the things were everywhere—not because of any particular marketing push but because they were cheap, accurate, and had this specific quality of looking slightly futuristic and slightly retro at the same time, which turns out to be a combination that ages extremely well. The nineties revival that’s been grinding away for the last several years finally circled back around to them, and Casio obliged with a Vintage collection: six classic models back in production, stainless steel, the same chunky digital displays, the same unpretentious proportions.

The line sits between thirty and sixty euros, which is still the right price for what these things are. Not an investment, not a statement about your relationship with horology—just a watch that works, happens to look good, and doesn’t demand anything from you. There’s real value in objects that don’t try to be more than they are.

Clara would say she never thought about whether it was cool. That’s exactly why it is.